Developing WASTEie: construction waste’s information exchange
Developing WASTEie: Update 1 – Approach
There is no doubt that the construction industry is unanimous in its ambition to innovate, evolve and improve to better our environment. Waste has typically not been the first topic raised when discussing sustainable construction, often dominated by carbon and energy initiatives, yet its impact is increasingly in the spotlight.
Data has a duty, and BIMBox, centre of excellence for digital construction consultancy, was recently appointed to a consortium of 23 global partners collaborating on the ‘RECONMATIC’ initiative alongside UK partners Morgan Sindall Construction, the University of Salford, the University of Manchester and Arco & Callisto Consulting, tasked to develop practical applications to better identify and minimise construction and demolition (C&D) waste.
Information Managers are able to uniquely contribute to the collective advancement of the industry’s path towards zero carbon in construction and demolition waste. As the issue of waste increasingly impacts our industry, BIMBox has provided an initial update in relation to their research focus and has invited comments and suggestions from readers who wish to contribute to this area.
It is understood that construction creates an estimated third of the world’s overall waste and at least 40% of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions. As part of the project, BIMBox, alongside the RECONMATIC team, is working on standardising C&D waste information exchange. Internally, this new data set is being referred to as WASTEie. Initially, we propose to use the IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) schema for parameter mapping, as it can be utilised by numerous software vendors. Further to this, to develop WASTEie, we are planning to use the yet to be published Information Delivery Specification (IDS), which is a framework used to write machine and human interpretable information requirements.
There are a few things to consider when we think about C&D waste. In an ideal world, our built assets would be designed to never produce waste in the first place, but of course – this is far from the current reality. This project acknowledges this and sets out to provide a practical response to these challenges.
Firstly, we need to understand when and where waste is generated. Based on a collective consortium experience and available research papers, we have grouped a few major streams where waste is generated (C&D only):
- Construction waste (materials, such as wood or even concrete and products, such as cut offs of laminate flooring or insulation)
- Defects (smashed windows, broken doors or equipment damaged during installation)
- Protective materials (during construction a lot of products will be covered with either plywood, plastic or protective sheets, which may be re-used, but some will be discarded as waste
- Temporary works (scaffold sheeting, materials used for foundation formworks etc.)
- Packaging (wrapping materials, pallets etc.)
- Demolition waste (this is where the majority of products become materials to be recycled or landfilled)
If you believe there are other waste streams not accounted for please do drop us a comment or get in touch directly.
These major categories will assist us in grouping the parameters into structured clusters and help us target our research efforts moving forward. It also provides us with the framework to identify relevant stakeholders who need to provide or consume information.
When we think about waste, the first area that comes to mind is materials. It’s not surprising that European (and British) Waste Classification Codes (EWC) relate to materials as well. Yet, when we dig deeper and attempt to represent waste in the world of BIM, materials alone are not sufficient as most construction products come as composite products. To illustrate this, we extracted the materials identified in the EWC and noticed that around 50% of materials will be embedded in products and will not necessarily be separated. See Table 1 – materials identified in orange will most likely be treated as products rather than materials.
This led us to recognise that it would be valuable to describe material properties, as well as product properties, that relate to waste information exchange. In essence, we are looking at the elements designed in project (e.g. in-situ concrete slab) and pre-manufactured products (e.g. doors, air handling units etc.). Refer to Figure 1.
While we can make use of the material list from EWC, we also need to group products into logical clusters, as it would be exceptionally challenging and too administratively burdensome to attempt to describe every product or even product category. To help us group the products, we looked at the IFC domains and found a great existing structure – see Table 2.
We quickly identified that architectural, electrical, HVAC, plumbing and fire protection, as well as structural domains, could be grouped under the ‘building domain’ as the properties to describe products in relation to waste information exchange would be remarkably similar, if not the same.
Materials & Products
This approach defines a framework of what information should be captured through material definition and through product properties, providing the scope to move forward.
The identification of the major waste streams will assist us moving forward with stakeholder engagement and parameter mapping. We also identified that we need to separate how we structure information for products and materials using waste classification codes and IFC schema as the basis for our approach.
We understand that the issue of waste extensively impacts all areas of our industry. As this is an ongoing research project, we’d like to take industry practitioners on our journey and invite readers to provide comments, suggestions and any alternative approaches not considered.
The key aim is to create something that will actually be useful for industry professionals, providing a practical application that will bring us closer to zero waste.
In our next update, we will focus upon waste related product properties in the building domain.
Authored by: Vitalij Tetervov – R&D Manager, BIMBox and Chris Crookes – Managing Director, BIMBox